Press release

01/04/20

01 April 2020

Ethical guidance published for frontline staff dealing with pandemic

The guidance reminds staff that the principles they need to observe during the pandemic are the same as they would normally be - including ensuring that care is provided in a fair and equitable way, that beds are allocated according to continual assessment and that decisions made, whether COVID-19 related or not, should be done according to protocol, in line with good clinical practice.

Accountability remains unchanged and clinical decisions, ideally made by more than one clinician, must be robustly documented.

The guidance reminds doctors of the importance of discussing with individual patients and their carers their wishes regarding ongoing care, and, again, that these decisions should be clearly recorded.

As well as having a duty to protect the public from harm, doctors have a right to protect themselves so that they can continue to care effectively, so the guidance underlines that it would be ethical for those who would be harmed by contracting COVID-19, including doctors aged over 70 or with underlying health conditions – as per the government’s guidance - to refrain from treating patients with (or suspected to have) the virus. They should instead take on duties away from high risk areas.

Clinicians should receive support from government and their employing trusts or health boards. Those working outside of their usual remit must get appropriate training and all frontline staff must have access to Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during the pandemic.

Professor Andrew Goddard, president of the Royal College of Physicians, said:

'These are extraordinary times and NHS frontline staff are going to have to make some very difficult decisions in the most challenging of circumstances in the days and weeks ahead. Many royal colleges and health organisations have worked together to produce this guidance and such collaboration is needed now more than ever before. The principles in the guidance are the same we would use in more ordinary times, and patients and families need to know that we will always strive to do the best for them, however trying the situation.'

Dr Alexis Paton, Chair of the RCP’s Committee on Ethical Issues in Medicine, who wrote the guidance, said:

‘Consistency and accountability nationwide are key to ethical decision-making during the pandemic, for the reassurance and protection of patients and health professionals alike. This guidance provides much needed clarity and consistency to all frontline staff during this crisis.’

The RCP’s guidance is supported by the Royal College of Anaesthetists, Royal College of Emergency Medicine, Royal College of General Practitioners, Royal College of Radiologists, Royal College of Ophthalmologists, Royal College of Nursing, Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow and Royal College of Psychiatrists, the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Medicine, Faculty of Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine and Faculty of Sports and Exercise Medicine.

 

Appendix 1 - Receiving the COVID-19 vaccine
When deciding whether to accept a COVID-19 vaccine, healthcare staff should consider the ethical and professional obligations to their practice, their patients and themselves. Staff have a duty of care towards their patients which they must balance with a duty of care to themselves. Based upon the available evidence, there is potential net benefit to an individual receiving the vaccine. This benefit is likely to extend to the community of people with whom they come into contact, including family, friends and patients. It may extend to society at large, by reducing the ability of the virus to spread. More generally, there must be transparency around prioritisation and rollout of vaccine and the RCP advocates that ethical principles of accountability, transparency, inclusivity, reasonableness and responsiveness, as set out in this guidance, are followed.
Appendix 2 - Ethical dilemma scenarios for ambulance-based clinical assessments during COVID-19
An appendix has been added to reflect the fact that, with the NHS weathering the second, considerably larger wave of COVID-19, patients are unfortunately needing clinical assessment by hospital staff in waiting ambulances. To help clarify the best, most ethical course of action in such circumstances, the RCP has based additional guidance around some common scenarios. This is not intended to normalise clinical assessment by acute medical teams of patients in waiting ambulances. The RCP also understands that such a situation will often be difficult for families and patients. But when all other measures to prevent this have been exhausted, healthcare staff can make valid and appropriate decisions in such circumstances.

Documents