Press release

10/07/15

10 July 2015

New advances prompt genetics guidance update

A new report from the Royal College of Physicians (RCP), Royal College of Pathologists and British Society for Human Genetics explores these issues and sets out clear guidelines for healthcare professionals.

The report guides healthcare professionals through the complex mix of legislation that applies to the use of genetic data and samples. Included in the guidance are worked examples, based on real cases illustrating how complex situations can be dealt with in practice. A key focus of the report is to illustrate how the family can be important in what otherwise might seem to be individual decisions.

Key recommendations from Consent and confidentiality in clinical genetic practice: Guidance on genetic testing and sharing genetic information include:

  • Family history and clinical information should be shared if it is relevant to the healthcare needs of family members. Health care professionals can share relevant information with each other without breaching their duty of confidentiality.
  • Patients should be informed in general terms of what happens to their sample and the information from it. This includes explaining that samples may be important in quality control of other tests and that their results may be incorporated into national data sets which are vital for developing evidence-based care.
  • For some genetic diagnoses medical interventions can modify the condition and in such cases, attempts should be made to ensure at risk relatives are aware of their risk. Communication might be through the patient, the general practitioner or other genetic service.

The guidance contains a list of key topics that should be discussed as part of the consent process for genetic testing. These include:

  • The potential benefits of genetic investigation in one person to their close relatives.
  • The fact that communication of certain aspects of information to family members may therefore be recommended.
  • The possibility of uncertain or unexpected findings from genetic testing and how these might be managed.

The report includes flowcharts for guided decision-making and simple consent forms which can be adapted for use in different settings.

Anneke Lucassen, Professor of clinical genetics at University of Southampton said:

As genetic practice expands and is no longer the sole preserve of regional genetics services, the issues around consent and confidentiality are becoming directly relevant to mainstream medical specialities, including general practice.

Most patients attend genetic services at least in part to help their family members, but concern about consent and confidentiality means that many health care professionals are uncertain what they can or cannot disclose to family members. The guidelines make this more explicit and provide useful flow-charts and consent forms to record the wishes of the patient.

Alison Hall from the PHG Foundation, a genetics policy think-tank, said:

Reliable information is the keystone to good practice in healthcare. Patients are content to undergo tests and to entrust confidential information to professionals in order to ensure that they get sound advice and treatment. The distinguishing feature in clinical genetics is that much of this information affects not only the individual patient but also other family members.

In this report we have identified some of the common uncertainties, and have described how health professionals can balance the interests of their patients and their relatives whilst still taking account of the requirements of the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Human Tissue Act 2004.

 

For further information, please contact Andrew McCracken, RCP Communications and New Media Adviser, on +44 (0)203 075 1354 / 07990 745 608, or email andrew.mccracken@rcplondon.ac.uk